Tenant Association Fighting Threat of Displacement to Save Affordable Housing
PROVIDENCE- West End Tenants have put up with mixed signals, deception, and broken promises from HUD. 38 families have been put under duress by local and regional HUD officials, who have attempted to have the tenants sign a contract to move off-site, before a preservation deal is closed to guarantee tenants their right to return and their right to continued participation in the Section 8 program.
A HUD Mark to Market (M2M) preservation plan, which if implemented would bring a $6.8 Million renovation to the project, has been on the table for a year. Tenants have supported this plan as what was thought to be the quickest way to fully fund long-overdue renovations to their homes.
However, tenants have not seen documentation of the plan including many of the changes that have delayed a closing. Tenants maintain they have the right to access this information, and that they need to be a part of the process to ensure their rights are protected and their homes are preserved.
Said long-time tenant and student Ninoska Garcia, “This has gone on too long. The lack of transparency and tenant involvement that we have suffered is the opposite of what we expect from the new HUD under President Obama.”
Specifically, tenants are demanding that HUD Headquarters step in to:
* Stop the off-site relocation plan that threatens displacement
* Provide information and a process to involve the tenants in decision-making, including bringing the management and purchasing team to the negotiation table for a written Tenant-Management Agreement, proposed by the Tenant Association, and
- Make the M2M plan work, or commit to an alternative preservation strategy if the M2M plan fails and the property falls to foreclosure.
With a foreclosure of the project becoming more likely, coming as soon as August, tenants are fighting to save their homes with a greater sense of urgency. In April, The Tenant Association voted on a set of principles that would protect their rights, improve conditions, and ensure meaningful tenant involvement in the decisions that affect their lives. They followed by appealing to HUD Headquarters with their demands.
Some weeks later in May and with the assistance of Senator Jack Reed’s office- the RI HUD Tenant Project, as advocates for the Tenants’ Association, was granted a conference call with Janet Golrick, Deputy Assistant Secretary of HUD’s Office of Affordable Housing Preservation (OAHP) in Washington, DC. There was no solid outcome from the call, other than it became apparent to those representing the tenants that HUD is still entrenched in some of the policies that devastated HUD-assisted affordable housing under the Bush Administration, including an internal HUD policy that calls for unconditional termination of the Section 8 contract for substandard properties.
Affordable housing experts including the Director of the National Alliance of HUD tenants, Michael Kane, contend that Congress has given HUD discretion to extend Section 8 for substandard properties, to allow time and money for emergency repairs to be done on occupied units, and a preservation plan such as the M2M deal to be executed.
Citing precedents of similar HUD projects around the country, Kane adds, “There is no statuatory basis for HUD to pull the plug on this and move the tenants out… In either scenario (M2M or foreclosure), there are resources available to HUD, state agencies, and the City (of Providence) for shovel-ready projects that can be used to prepare plans and specs for the rehab, and to pay for emergency repairs in the mean time.”
Another HUD project comes to mind when we look at what’s happening and more importantly- what could happen with Medina Village. Grove Parc in Chicago recieved a lot of press for the connections between its developers and the Obama campaign. Grove Parc boasts 504 units of affordable family housing to Medina Village’s 83. But like Medina Village, Grove Parc had an extremely high vacancy rate and an extremely low REAC inspection score- an 11 on a scale of 100, compared to a 16, the lowest in New England for Medina Village.
When HUD threatened forclosure and displacement for some 400 families, Grove Parc tenants fought back to save their homes. Together they organized, sought the support of the community and elected officials, and secure a new developer for the project that agreed to work with the tenants input and demands.
Medina Village, like Grove Parc, is a battleground of national significance in defending and demanding the human right to housing- as the pressures build on low-income communities from gentrification,privitizing public housing, voucherization by HUD,
criminilization, and the economic crisis.
Tenants warn that if Medina Village is not preserved, 83 units of affordable family housing will be lost, and more people will end up on the street. “When people don’t have a place to live, they sometimes have to turn to the streets to provide for their families, feeding the cycle of criminalization that has plagued the City. It makes more sense to invest in housing than in prisons,” said tenant Sandra Marrow.
In this time of economic crisis, tenants are demanding the long overdue reinvestment promised to stabilize their neighborhood and community. By renovating Medina Village, 45 additional families on the lengthy, closed Section 8 waiting list could receive affordable, decent housing- helping not only the neighborhood but the City and State.